About Me

Name: Cindy of TX
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Green Ham, No Eggs - A Suessical Parody

Posted by Cindy of TX on Sunday, October 05, 2008 9:09:18 AM
   I couldn't get this classic Dr. Suess story out of my head back in late spring, when Obama kept dodging the offer of townhall debates offered by John McCain.  With respect to the wonderful Dr. Suess, I enjoyed tweaking his classic story, just a bit.  Since this week's debate is in the townhall style, I wanted to share this with you. 
 
 

GREEN EGGS AND HAM ~ OBAMA-STYLE

I am John
I am John
John I am

That John-I-am!
That John-I-am!
I do not like
that John-I-am!

Do you like
townhall debates?

I do not like them,
John McCain.
I do not like
townhall debates.

Would you like them
here or there?

I would not like them
here or there.
I would not like them
anywhere.
I do not like
townhall debates.
I do not like them John McCain.

Would you like them
in the summer?
Would you like them
in large numbers?

I do not like them
in the summer.
I do not like them
in large numbers.
I do not like them
here or there.
I do not like them
anywhere.
I do not like townhall debates.
I do not like them, John McCain.

Would you do one in a bus?
Would that be worth all of the fuss?

Not in a bus.
Not worth the fuss.
Not in the summer.
Not in large numbers.
I would not do them here or there.
I would not do them anywhere.
I would not do townhall debates.
I do not like them, John-I-am.

Would you? Could you?
          On a base?            
Do them! Do them!
Make your case.

I would not,
could not,
on a base.

You may like them.
You will see.
You may like them
by the sea!

I would not, could not by the sea.
Not on a base! You let me be.

I do not like them in a bus.
I do like all of the fuss.
I do not like them in the summer.
I do not like them in large numbers.
I do not like them here or there.
I do not like them anywhere.
I do not like townhall debates.
I do not like them, John McCain.

A train! A train!
A train! A train!
Could you, would you,
on a train?

Not on a train! Not by the sea!
Not on a base! John! Let me be!

I would not, could not, in a bus.
It could not, would not, be worth the fuss.
I will not do them in the summer.
I will not do them in large numbers.
I will not do them here or there.
I will not do them anywhere.
I do not do townhall debates.
I do not like them, John McCain.
************************


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (9) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Palin's Big Debate: Truth or Dare?

Posted by Cindy of TX on Tuesday, September 30, 2008 7:58:58 PM
   In her GOP convention nomination acceptance speech, Governor Palin raised all our hopes with these lines: 

"I’m not a member of the permanent political establishment. And I’ve learned quickly, these past few days, that if you’re not a member in good standing of the Washington elite, then some in the media consider a candidate unqualified for that reason alone. But here’s a little news flash for all those reporters and commentators: I’m not going to Washington to seek their good opinion - I’m going to Washington to serve the people of this country."   

   The media had already pelted some heavy ammunition at her at the time of this speech, but she likely had no idea how much more was still to come...or how true was her assessment about being a Washington "outsider".  
 
   I call "Truth or Dare" on Governor Palin and the McCain campaign as the Vice-Presidential debate approaches on Thursday.  I think most of us Palin supporters out here on "Main Street" or in the "Heartland" or in "Flyover America"...whatever term you choose to use to describe us...are crossing our fingers and wishing on stars that she meant what she said that night at the GOP convention.  Please, Governor Palin, please take "truth" on this:  show us that the opinion of the reporters and commentators is not the good opinion you seek.  Prove to us that you understand that we do not really care if you know all the ins and out of the U.N.,  we KNOW  it is not our friend and is not looking out for us.  Demonstrate in this debate that you have the essentials we know are important to leading this country:  common sense, conservative principles, steadfastness, management experience, good judgement, and proper comportment.  Show some faith in us.  We understand that the executive branch of government comes with a good deal of expert help - and we expect President McCain and his staff will choose wisely in this regard. 
 
   If you choose the "dare" side of this challenge, I fear the outcome.  Daring the media to call you the winner of this debate is a foolish risk.  Playing their game will suck you into a losing gambit, and set you up for a fall.  Better, in this supporter's eyes, for you to take the "truth" side of this challenge for the debate.   Seek OUR good opinion.  We want to see that you understand who WE are.  If you have faith in us, you will win our faith in you.
 
Truth?  Or, dare?
 
All the best to you in this debate.  Go get 'em!
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (9) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama's America - Past Tense Inspiration?

Posted by Cindy of TX on Saturday, September 27, 2008 9:18:34 PM
   In his zeal to provide change and hope, Obama has placed himself in a position, seemingly intentionally, of being part of an America where there is no hope, and certainly no pride.  I suppose that position is meant to show all of us how badly we need him.  Ironically, it does nothing but clearly demonstrate how desparately we cannot possibly accept him.  I submit as evidence Obama's closing remarks from Debate 1, Oxford, Mississippi, which start with the anecdote about his Kenyan father writing letters seeking to come to the U.S. where "our ideals and values inspired the world."  He follows this comment, where America's inspiration to the world is relegated to the past tense, with this statement:
   "I don't think any of us can say that our standing in the world now, the way children around the world look at the United States, is the same."   
   This is a stunning statement.  First of all, it is simply and patently untrue.  I realize the senator has been very busy with his campaign, but surely he was able to watch at least a snippet of the Olympics - at least the part where the American athletes received one of the largest and loudest ovations of all during the opening ceremonies.  I am also aware that there has not been much time to participate in the important debates on the Senate floor in the past two years (and it has seemed that long!), but it couldn't have escaped his notice that we are having a bit of a problem with immigration issues here in the U.S. and if Kenya is having the same problem, I'm not aware of it.
   It boils down to this: America's inspiration lives today!  We all know it.  Obama's statement in the closing moments of Debate 1 does not reflect a lack of inspiration in America; it reflects a lack of inspiration in the man who made the statement.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (14) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

McCain - Steady and Ready; Obama - Flaky and Shaky

Posted by Cindy of TX on Friday, September 26, 2008 11:52:47 PM

   I have a confession: I started getting a little bored about half-way through the first debate.  Even still, there were some interesting points made.  My favorite of the night was McCain's reference to the infamous Obama campaign pseudo-presidential seal, thus proving for all time and once-and-for-all that McCain does, indeed, have access to and interest in the blogosphere and the internet.  Ta-da!!!!

   Seriously, looking at the debate with the criteria outlined in my previous post, McCain did very well.  He did not apologize for going to DC to participate in solving one of the most serious economic problems in our lifetimes (imagine having to apologize for going to work!)  He was confidant.  He fielded the expected questions regarding the economy, although I would have liked him to communicate more effectively that the differences between his plan and Obama's plan are the classic differences between a conservative view and a liberal view. (Do you think you or the government is better able to spend your money?) McCain consistently showed respect for his opponent by referring to him as "Senator Obama", while he was called simply "John" by Obama.  I think that made Obama look even younger and more juvenile - and for a young man to use that level of familiarity with an elder was not favorable.  McCain went on the offense many times, especially in regard to Iran, while Obama was left interrupting or trying to, glancing around, raising his finger to get attention, and generally appearing frustrated.  McCain came off as a feisty statesman, while Obama came off like that smarty-pants honor student in the front row who you eventually just get tired of hearing from. 
 
 Lehrer's questions were straight-forward, so there was no need for McCain to challenge the questions themselves, only Obama's skirting of those questions, and his parsing of words, which McCain specifically pointed out at least once.  He was also effective at fending off Obama's continued and transparent attempt to connect McCain with Bush, which is really becoming tedious at this point.  I do wish the memo would be passed around that Bush is not running, and McCain has not been Bush's BFF during the last 8 years.  
 
   Bottom line:  McCain demonstrated his vast experience in foreign policy and his ability and readiness to lead and guide the US through some hard times.  Best of all, he did not buy in to the Democrat's line that the United States has lost standing in the world.  He knows we are still the country the others wish to be, and Americans are going to vote for a man who respects America, not one who apologizes for it.  I say McCain came out steady and ready, and won this round.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (7) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

McCain's Task - Debate 1: Ready, Steady, Go!

Posted by Cindy of TX on Friday, September 26, 2008 5:30:00 PM
   After all the drama that preceded this debate (will he? won't he?), it is of utmost importance that McCain take the stage with confidence - please, no apologies - and controls the content of the debate.  Sure, allow a couple of off-topic questions regarding the economy because everyone expects it and deserves it.  Stay steady and refrain from taking the first punch.  Obama will soon enough lose his patience and won't be able to keep himself from making an attack statement.  Then, he will be perceived as negative and petty (not that big of a stretch) and McCain will have the upper hand in the statesman category.  Score on our side!
  McCain needs to clearly delineate the difference between his world view in regard to foreign policy and Obama's world view; he can highlight his wealth of experience in this area, and take Obama to school.  People need to see that when there is action that needs to be taken - McCain's the one who can be counted upon to do just that.
   Make sure that each question is examined for a false premise before answering it.  That's how moderators force unfortunate answers from candidates.  If McCain does not accept the premise of a question, challenge it right off the bat.  Don't try to answer it or spin an answer to a question that is worded in such a way as to force a certain perspective from the answer!
   Be yourself, McCain - be ready, be steady, and go!  Roger that?  You betcha.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »